Micro Frontends: When They Make Sense (And When They’re Overkill)

This is one of the main reasons why so many product-based companies shut down before they even have a real chance.
The first focus should always be simple: build the simplest thing that works. Launch what you have. Get feedback from your earliest users. Make them happy. Iterate based on real needs, not hypothetical scaling problems.
Only after you start seeing traction should you start thinking about scaling for bigger audiences, more features, and a more sophisticated architecture.
But even then, build with a clear idea:
Once you have answers to these, you can start architecting more thoughtfully, not prematurely, but responsively.
That brings us to architecture patterns.
On the backend, it could be microservices.
On the frontend, it might be microfrontends.
Now, specifically about the frontend: microfrontends are an architectural strategy designed to help large, fast-moving teams build and maintain complex web apps.
But just like every tool, they’re useful only when applied at the right time, for the right reasons.
Let’s break this down in simple terms.
Imagine an organization building a web platform. It has:
Now imagine each of those sections is being developed by a different team.
Each team wants to update their section independently, without waiting for others.
That’s where micro frontends come in.
Just like how microservices break backend systems into smaller independent services, micro frontends break the frontend into smaller independent modules.
Instead of one huge frontend app, you have many small apps living together, appearing as one seamless experience to the user.
Each part specializes and updates on its own.
Let’s make it even simpler:
Each feature is coded separately. The billing team doesn’t touch the dashboard code.
Each micro frontend is owned by a dedicated team , from development to testing to deployment.
Teams can deploy their section without waiting for a global site update.
Even though different teams are working, everything feels consistent because they share a common design language.
These separate parts are stitched together either:
Micro frontends can be powerful when used in the right context. Here’s when they truly shine:
You have dozens of developers split across different domains, and coordination overhead becomes painful.
Example:
A 200-person team working on a massive e-commerce platform.
You have hundreds of pages and complex features that can’t be reasonably managed in a single codebase.
Example:
Think of platforms like YouTube or Amazon , homepage, product pages, checkout, support, all separate systems.
You need to ship small changes fast without breaking other parts of the application.
Example:
Updating only the billing section without redeploying the entire web app.
You want to replace a legacy frontend without rebuilding everything from scratch.
Example:
Gradually migrating a PHP-based portal to a React+Vue hybrid.
Different teams might prefer different frameworks based on their expertise.
Example:
Using Vue.js for a customer portal and React for an admin dashboard.
Most projects don’t need micro frontends. Here’s when you should definitely avoid them:
If you have less than 10 developers, managing orchestration is unnecessary complexity.
Example:
A startup building a SaaS MVP with a few simple screens.
If the entire app has less than 10 pages, a monolithic architecture is faster and safer.
Example:
Portfolios, blogs, internal company tools.
If all developers work on all parts, you don’t need strict domain boundaries.
Micro frontends can introduce issues like:
If user experience and speed are your top priorities (think mobile-first apps), read carefully.
Micro frontends require serious engineering discipline.
You’ll need:
“Micro frontends must mean micro UIs.”
Nope. A micro frontend could be an entire section or route, not just a button.
“Mixing React, Vue, and Angular is easy.”
Technically possible, practically messy. Needs careful orchestration.
“Micro frontends make everything faster.”
Wrong. They usually introduce more network requests and larger bundle sizes if not carefully managed.
“Only big enterprises need them.”
Mostly true. Most startups and medium-sized products should start simple and evolve only if needed.
Use micro frontends to solve scaling problems , not to create complexity where none exists.
“Start by Understanding Single-SPA:”
Single-SPA is the simplest starting point to understand how multiple frontend apps can work together. It is a lightweight JavaScript framework that allows you to load and mount multiple independent applications on the same page without conflicts.
Set up a basic Single-SPA project where two small apps, like a header and a footer, load independently on the same page.
“Learn About Module Federation in Webpack 5:”
Module Federation allows different applications to share code at runtime. One app can dynamically import components, utilities, or even entire pages from another app without bundling everything together at build time.
Build two small apps where one app exposes a shared component and another app consumes it live at runtime.
“Study Real-World Case Studies of Micro Frontend Architectures:”
Observing how major companies structure their micro frontend architectures will give you a broader perspective.
Find and read at least three detailed case studies on companies like Spotify, Amazon, or IKEA and sketch a rough architecture diagram of how you think their frontend system is organized.
“Contribute to Open-Source Projects That Use Micro Frontends:”
Hands-on experience is critical after learning the basics. Find an open-source project that mentions module federation or single-spa.
Start with simple contributions like fixing small bugs or improving documentation and gradually move toward bigger tasks.
“Build a Mini Micro Frontend Project of Your Own:”
Think of a small application broken into three parts for example a dashboard app, a profile management app, and a notifications app.
Build each part as an independent micro frontend and bring them together on a shared page using Single-SPA and Module Federation.
Micro frontends are powerful, but they are a scaling solution , not a startup strategy.
If you’re just starting out, build the simplest thing that works. Focus on delighting early users, collecting real feedback, and keeping your system clean.
When your team grows, your product matures, and your coordination challenges become real, that’s when smart architectural patterns like micro frontends start to make sense.